There's a poker party going on in the other room. I've never actually been to a poker party, and have cleared out of the house the few times the Winemaker has hosted in the past. But, um, we have kids now, so although I took them out and kept them out past their bedtimes in hope they'd be able to fall into exhausted sleep despite there being PEOPLE! DOWNSTAIRS! EATING CHIPS!, I still did have to return home while the boys were going strong.
Now I feel like an anthropologist. We have out there 8 men, all in their 40s (I think). We've got plenty of liberals, because that's how we roll, and a couple of conservatives, because my husband used to work at a place that seemed to have lots of fairly right-wing guys. No fights have broken out, although when one made a definitive economic statement, another politely but firmly disagreed. We have the guy down the street, whom we met last summer because of our kids being kindergarten best friends, and his next-door neighbor, who brought the actual poker table. (I somehow thought that family were Mormon, but this guy is the drinking/smoking/swearing leader at the table, so I guess I was wrong on that.) We've got a couple of quiet guys, my husband being one, and a few extroverted comedians. There's even a genuine ex-con, which somehow seems like not the person to play poker with.
I sat with them for awhile, soaking in the atmosphere, but one of our friends seemed to feel like he should be talking to me, and I felt bad for him, so I slipped away. Much like when I get together with my old friends, the humor is definitely sophomoric, with plenty of teasing going on. One guy is doing some subtle bitching about his wife, and one is doing some less subtle complaning about his kids. The others are not taking the bait, and I think it's not just due to my presence. I think the not-Mormon-neighbor is the only one who had more than a couple of beers, and the only one who smoked. (Stepped outside, thank God, but still pretty stinky.) They all have been given nicknames. I think a stranger would have a hard time telling which ones are old friends and which are just meeting others tonight.
I know which guys take strategy games pretty seriously--like, say, my husband and his oldest friend here tonight, both of whom were on the national championship chess team when they were in high school. The stranger-neighbor seemed maybe a little too drunk to really focus, but the rest are all doing their best. The game has gotten quieter and quieter as this round progresses.
Conventional wisdom is that men bond over experiences, and don't necessarily share emotionally even with men they consider to be good friends. The Winemaker misses the friendships he had when he was younger--I think because in those days "the guys" got together frequently to drink and/or hang out, and now that they are all fathers and husbands first, friends second, those events have dwindled away. I think this kind of group event is still where my husband can relax and bond. My friendships, for the most part, are based around talking to one other person. We can do stuff while we talk, but the talking is the bonding part. So I don't need to invite a bunch of people over and plan an event to keep that friendship connection--I can meet one friend and her kid in the park, and we can chat and laugh over our kids' heads, or I can sit and have coffee with another friend for as long as I can get away. I understand the appeal of this kind of evening--I have a group of old friends that I love to see, because I know there will be belly laughs--but I wish for the Winemaker that he could find simpler ways to stay connected to people. Still, they're having a good time, and the only guy who got drunk is going to walk home.
Saturday, April 6, 2013
Sunday, March 17, 2013
Where Being Cheap meets Birthday Dreams
Trying to decide whether or not to buy Linden an American Girl doll for her upcoming birthday. Her best friend/neighbor has one, and her cousin has one. My nieces had them, fifteen years or more ago. It's hard to see paying over a hundred bucks for a doll. We looked on Craigslist, but a) it's also hard to see paying eighty bucks for a doll, and b) if you ARE going to pay an outrageous amount of money for a doll, you may as well splurge and get your little girl her own brand new doll.
Or not. They come with all this additional pressure to spend ridiculous amounts of money. Our niece took hers to Seattle, and got her hair done. For fifty dollars. I pay $15 for a haircut; there is no way in HELL I am paying more for a doll's hairstyle. The neighbor girl is taking hers to Seattle over spring break to get her ears pierced. ($40). I was tempted to say, "Just stick a straight pin into her head, like I did when I was a kid," but her dad was standing right there. You're probably not supposed to stick pins into hundred dollar dolls. (Not to mention the whole trip-to-Seattle thing. It's a driveable distance for us, obvoiusly, but we'd have to get a hotel, eat out, etc. This becomes a lot of money to spend on glamorizing a doll.)
From my tone, you'd think the decision would be obvious. But I loved my dolls when I was a girl. And my parents bought me three Madame Alexander dolls over the years, which were the 1970's expensive doll. So there's part of me that just as a mom wants to get her this special treat. Add into that this nagging feeling of knowing how much she's missed out on in her childhood. There are so many things her friend and her cousin take for granted that she didn't get. Most are not things, of course, but I can't escape the (irrational) feeling that if I can get her this one special thing, it will--not make it up, but at least give her one less thing to feel the lack of.
It doesn't help that Oak is totally consumed with consumption. He wants to buy, buy, buy, all the time, and he has no recognition of how that momentary buyer's high never lasts. We give them a small allowance, divided into save, spend, and share money. Every week he takes his $2 spending money and blows it at the Dollar Store, on two pieces of plastic crap. A few items wind up being actually played with over time, but most wind up scattered under his bed, traded away on the schoolbus, or broken, if not actually defective upon opening. It makes me feel like the splurges or carefully thought out gifts aren't seen as significant, because it all gets lost in a blur of "Okay, NOW I want to get THIS!" Linden isn't quite as caught up as he is--she tags along and blows her allowance too, but unlike Oak, she doesn't pine for items that aren't directly in front of her face. The American Girl doll is one of the few things she's talked about repeatedly, which makes me lean towards getting it for her.
Then again, she's talked about plans for her birthday party for the last six months, and her ideas include a skating party, a Barbie cake, a pinata, balloons, and I don't remember what all else. This is not in the "We could do this, or we could do that" frame of mind, either. She is hoping for ALL these things. Again, as a child of the '70s who hasn't had to attend many modern children's parties, I say have a couple of friends over, serve homemade cake, play tag in the back yard, open some gifts, and send everyone home. I thought it was cool if my mom let me pick out matching paper plates and napkins. And this birthday, the first kids' birthday our family has had, will set the tone. While I may well be willing to take kids skating, or hiking, or even have a slumber party ON OCCASION, I don't want the expectation to be the kind of highly organized, highly expensive, "rent a pony and a clown" kind of event that Linden is not-so-secretly hoping for. I have taken to telling her, when she starts talking American Girl Doll (or American Doll Girl, as she says), that IF we are able to afford that kind of doll, it will limit the kind of party she can have. Maybe I need to sit her down and say--skating party and small gift? Or AGD and have some friends over to play at our house?
Or not. They come with all this additional pressure to spend ridiculous amounts of money. Our niece took hers to Seattle, and got her hair done. For fifty dollars. I pay $15 for a haircut; there is no way in HELL I am paying more for a doll's hairstyle. The neighbor girl is taking hers to Seattle over spring break to get her ears pierced. ($40). I was tempted to say, "Just stick a straight pin into her head, like I did when I was a kid," but her dad was standing right there. You're probably not supposed to stick pins into hundred dollar dolls. (Not to mention the whole trip-to-Seattle thing. It's a driveable distance for us, obvoiusly, but we'd have to get a hotel, eat out, etc. This becomes a lot of money to spend on glamorizing a doll.)
From my tone, you'd think the decision would be obvious. But I loved my dolls when I was a girl. And my parents bought me three Madame Alexander dolls over the years, which were the 1970's expensive doll. So there's part of me that just as a mom wants to get her this special treat. Add into that this nagging feeling of knowing how much she's missed out on in her childhood. There are so many things her friend and her cousin take for granted that she didn't get. Most are not things, of course, but I can't escape the (irrational) feeling that if I can get her this one special thing, it will--not make it up, but at least give her one less thing to feel the lack of.
It doesn't help that Oak is totally consumed with consumption. He wants to buy, buy, buy, all the time, and he has no recognition of how that momentary buyer's high never lasts. We give them a small allowance, divided into save, spend, and share money. Every week he takes his $2 spending money and blows it at the Dollar Store, on two pieces of plastic crap. A few items wind up being actually played with over time, but most wind up scattered under his bed, traded away on the schoolbus, or broken, if not actually defective upon opening. It makes me feel like the splurges or carefully thought out gifts aren't seen as significant, because it all gets lost in a blur of "Okay, NOW I want to get THIS!" Linden isn't quite as caught up as he is--she tags along and blows her allowance too, but unlike Oak, she doesn't pine for items that aren't directly in front of her face. The American Girl doll is one of the few things she's talked about repeatedly, which makes me lean towards getting it for her.
Then again, she's talked about plans for her birthday party for the last six months, and her ideas include a skating party, a Barbie cake, a pinata, balloons, and I don't remember what all else. This is not in the "We could do this, or we could do that" frame of mind, either. She is hoping for ALL these things. Again, as a child of the '70s who hasn't had to attend many modern children's parties, I say have a couple of friends over, serve homemade cake, play tag in the back yard, open some gifts, and send everyone home. I thought it was cool if my mom let me pick out matching paper plates and napkins. And this birthday, the first kids' birthday our family has had, will set the tone. While I may well be willing to take kids skating, or hiking, or even have a slumber party ON OCCASION, I don't want the expectation to be the kind of highly organized, highly expensive, "rent a pony and a clown" kind of event that Linden is not-so-secretly hoping for. I have taken to telling her, when she starts talking American Girl Doll (or American Doll Girl, as she says), that IF we are able to afford that kind of doll, it will limit the kind of party she can have. Maybe I need to sit her down and say--skating party and small gift? Or AGD and have some friends over to play at our house?
Monday, March 4, 2013
Damned if you do...
It is so hard for me when people assume that the kids have been home for 8 months now, and they look awfully darn cute, and their English has really come along, so we must all be adjusted and just enjoying ourselves so much. It makes me want to tell them about how often we get calls and emails from the school about Oak's behavior, and about how irrationally angry I get at Linden over really weird things, and about how concerned I remain about FAS spectrum issues, and how many times a week some combination of us visits our therapist, and how the only reason I'm not on medication is because I'm too ashamed to tell my doctor how enraged I get, and how we just passed the two year anniversary of their sister's death and...
Then there are the people who say, "Oh, that is so KIND of you, you guys are so WONDERFUL for doing this for those poor kids," and I snap back something about how lucky we are to have them, how they created our family for us.
The other night I got something about how sometimes misfortune turns into good fortune. I was so creeped out by the notion that the happiness (yes, despite the truth of the first paragraph, there is much joy) of having these kids in our family is worth the misery that they and their first family went through that I just drifted away from the person talking before they were done. It was a large party. I don't think it was all that obvoius. Actually, I don't really care.
Basically, I don't want anyone to say anything about it. But if you act like the parenting we're doing is exactly the same as the parenting you do for your bio kids, that annoys me too.
I think these are the things people have said that felt right:
My mother-in-law, whom the kids mooned and threw apples at the first time they met, said, "I've been thinking a lot, and I think my job is just to love all of you without worrying about trying to change anything."
My sister, who has talked a lot to my other sister, who dropped out of our family for a decade after adopting a domestic sibling group, said, "Parenting is the hardest job anyone does, and you are doing it under especially difficult circumstances. Stop judging yourself. You're doing fine."
My third sister called me the day after Christmas and said, "It seemed like you were kind of stressed about the kids yesterday. They were delightful. I just want you to know that we all see how great they are, even though we know you guys have a lot to deal with."
I guess if you're not family, you're best off just hitting "like" on our facebook photos and leaving it at that.
Then there are the people who say, "Oh, that is so KIND of you, you guys are so WONDERFUL for doing this for those poor kids," and I snap back something about how lucky we are to have them, how they created our family for us.
The other night I got something about how sometimes misfortune turns into good fortune. I was so creeped out by the notion that the happiness (yes, despite the truth of the first paragraph, there is much joy) of having these kids in our family is worth the misery that they and their first family went through that I just drifted away from the person talking before they were done. It was a large party. I don't think it was all that obvoius. Actually, I don't really care.
Basically, I don't want anyone to say anything about it. But if you act like the parenting we're doing is exactly the same as the parenting you do for your bio kids, that annoys me too.
I think these are the things people have said that felt right:
My mother-in-law, whom the kids mooned and threw apples at the first time they met, said, "I've been thinking a lot, and I think my job is just to love all of you without worrying about trying to change anything."
My sister, who has talked a lot to my other sister, who dropped out of our family for a decade after adopting a domestic sibling group, said, "Parenting is the hardest job anyone does, and you are doing it under especially difficult circumstances. Stop judging yourself. You're doing fine."
My third sister called me the day after Christmas and said, "It seemed like you were kind of stressed about the kids yesterday. They were delightful. I just want you to know that we all see how great they are, even though we know you guys have a lot to deal with."
I guess if you're not family, you're best off just hitting "like" on our facebook photos and leaving it at that.
Sunday, February 17, 2013
Quiet Boxes, Salad Kings, and Because It's Sunday
If I had a dime for every time someone told me that kids like routine...well, I'd at least have enough for a latte. We do find that the parts of our days that follow a predictable pattern tend to go well. Even the glitches get predictable, and so easily overcome.
We've been taking a free class for adoptive parents, taught by a therapist with 14 kids, most of whom are adopted. She talks a lot about how she raised the first seven, compared to the last seven, when they had actually figured out what they were doing. The class has given us several ideas about adding to our routine. With a three day weekend here, we pulled together a few elements and are trying it out. We got Linden to bed a half hour earlier than usual (our goal is a full hour), so something went right.
Step one is reinstating kitchen help. We'd had that going last fall, then Oak started wrestling 3 nights a week, I went back to work, and it started to feel like more trouble than it was worth. Tonight Oak helped with dinner, and Linden with dishes. They'll swap each night, with Fridays off. Helping with dinner means making salad, setting the table, and any other tasks designated by the cooking parent. They like the power of being the salad maker (Oak used minimal lettuce, unpeeled cucumbers, no bell pepper, and lots of tomatoes and pickles), and they like having the rest of the family thank them for dinner. Dishes are a harder sell, but once they get going, they like the water play aspects, and with both jobs, they are getting individual time with a parent, and the knowledge that they are contributing to the household. Linden and I both like to sing, so that makes us great dishwashing partners. There are always exceptions, but it feels like often our cycle is "the kids are misbehaving, so I'm working hard and stressed out, so I want a break, so I'm going to let them watch DVDs/go over to their friend's/squabble for a few more minutes..." OR "We're actively engaged with the kids, so they are relaxed and happy, so we're enjoying being with them, so if they start to misbehave I can handle it approrpriately and get them back on track..." Working side by side with them definitely contributes to the happier cycle.
Step two is new. Working side by side is great, but only when they are working with you instead of competing for your attention. To make this possible, we put together "quiet boxes." In a plastic box, there are about five different small toys or simple projects. The kid who is NOT helping is to sit on their blankie and entertain themselves in the living room. The rules are basically that the person with the quiet box can't talk to the rest of us, and the person helping in the kitchen can't walk on the Quiet Blanket, or otherwise harrass their sibling. I think we've sold it well as a special treat. Quiet Box toys are not in general circulation, and the kids can only play with the QB at the designated time. The therapist said the kids need to learn how to do quiet, independent work--not relying on us to entertain them, not engaging in mindless squabbling with their siblings, and also not distracting their minds with physical activities. She also said we need to work it so this activity happens at the time most beneficial for us. So rather than having to have two kids underfoot, or have both parents equally busy around the dinner work, we hope this will be the way to occupy the "waiting" child.
Step three is setting a more formal schedule. We all know that after dinner, Mom helps Oak with homework, and Linden has to entertain herself or hang out with Papa. Somewhere in there we get dessert. They brush their teeth, I read some stories, and then we each get one kid to sleep. We've known for awhile that Linden probably needs to get to bed earlier, but we couldn't figure out on the fly how to make it happen. This weekend I finally sat down and worked out a timeline. First this, then that. What each kid's schedule needs to be, where each parent needs to be at each step to keep it all moving forward. I think it went pretty well tonight, given that we made it halfway to our goal of an hour earlier bedtime for Linden. Of course, I heard Oak's voice at 9:45, which is half an hour AFTER he should be asleep, and there were a few times when people thought they were in trouble for being off-schedule (possibly because my tone, posture, and even words were giving that impression), and I had to take a deep breath and say "This is our first time. We're testing it out and finding out what we need to adjust. You're doing fine."
There are more things we need to do, but we're hoping that a smooth evening routine and a longer night's sleep for the kindergartener will both be beneficial to all of us. Neither the Winemaker nor I are natural schedule followers, but when I realized that my kids consider "Because it's Sunday" to be a completely acceptable answer to "Why do I have to clean my room?" I knew that setting schedules could help us with other issues as well.
We've been taking a free class for adoptive parents, taught by a therapist with 14 kids, most of whom are adopted. She talks a lot about how she raised the first seven, compared to the last seven, when they had actually figured out what they were doing. The class has given us several ideas about adding to our routine. With a three day weekend here, we pulled together a few elements and are trying it out. We got Linden to bed a half hour earlier than usual (our goal is a full hour), so something went right.
Step one is reinstating kitchen help. We'd had that going last fall, then Oak started wrestling 3 nights a week, I went back to work, and it started to feel like more trouble than it was worth. Tonight Oak helped with dinner, and Linden with dishes. They'll swap each night, with Fridays off. Helping with dinner means making salad, setting the table, and any other tasks designated by the cooking parent. They like the power of being the salad maker (Oak used minimal lettuce, unpeeled cucumbers, no bell pepper, and lots of tomatoes and pickles), and they like having the rest of the family thank them for dinner. Dishes are a harder sell, but once they get going, they like the water play aspects, and with both jobs, they are getting individual time with a parent, and the knowledge that they are contributing to the household. Linden and I both like to sing, so that makes us great dishwashing partners. There are always exceptions, but it feels like often our cycle is "the kids are misbehaving, so I'm working hard and stressed out, so I want a break, so I'm going to let them watch DVDs/go over to their friend's/squabble for a few more minutes..." OR "We're actively engaged with the kids, so they are relaxed and happy, so we're enjoying being with them, so if they start to misbehave I can handle it approrpriately and get them back on track..." Working side by side with them definitely contributes to the happier cycle.
Step two is new. Working side by side is great, but only when they are working with you instead of competing for your attention. To make this possible, we put together "quiet boxes." In a plastic box, there are about five different small toys or simple projects. The kid who is NOT helping is to sit on their blankie and entertain themselves in the living room. The rules are basically that the person with the quiet box can't talk to the rest of us, and the person helping in the kitchen can't walk on the Quiet Blanket, or otherwise harrass their sibling. I think we've sold it well as a special treat. Quiet Box toys are not in general circulation, and the kids can only play with the QB at the designated time. The therapist said the kids need to learn how to do quiet, independent work--not relying on us to entertain them, not engaging in mindless squabbling with their siblings, and also not distracting their minds with physical activities. She also said we need to work it so this activity happens at the time most beneficial for us. So rather than having to have two kids underfoot, or have both parents equally busy around the dinner work, we hope this will be the way to occupy the "waiting" child.
Step three is setting a more formal schedule. We all know that after dinner, Mom helps Oak with homework, and Linden has to entertain herself or hang out with Papa. Somewhere in there we get dessert. They brush their teeth, I read some stories, and then we each get one kid to sleep. We've known for awhile that Linden probably needs to get to bed earlier, but we couldn't figure out on the fly how to make it happen. This weekend I finally sat down and worked out a timeline. First this, then that. What each kid's schedule needs to be, where each parent needs to be at each step to keep it all moving forward. I think it went pretty well tonight, given that we made it halfway to our goal of an hour earlier bedtime for Linden. Of course, I heard Oak's voice at 9:45, which is half an hour AFTER he should be asleep, and there were a few times when people thought they were in trouble for being off-schedule (possibly because my tone, posture, and even words were giving that impression), and I had to take a deep breath and say "This is our first time. We're testing it out and finding out what we need to adjust. You're doing fine."
There are more things we need to do, but we're hoping that a smooth evening routine and a longer night's sleep for the kindergartener will both be beneficial to all of us. Neither the Winemaker nor I are natural schedule followers, but when I realized that my kids consider "Because it's Sunday" to be a completely acceptable answer to "Why do I have to clean my room?" I knew that setting schedules could help us with other issues as well.
Sunday, February 10, 2013
Letter to my sisters
Yesterday, two of my sisters both sent me emails saying basically, "I love you, I miss you, I know you're super busy, are you okay?" So I wrote them a long letter back. One great thing about writing is I can do it when the kids are in bed. Phone calls not so much, in part because bedtime happens kind of late around here. Anyway, I'm plagiarizing myself here, because I did say a lot of what's been on my mind this week.
The Winemaker
has launched himself into some sort of amazing dad zone lately. Getting kids
vaccination appointments, finding us sitters so we can take this free adoptive
parenting class on Wednesday
nights, cutting down on the kids' screen time and taking them to parks
after school, and guaranteeing that in a school full of Intel kids, our kids had
the two most over-engineered entries in the egg drop contest Friday. (He was all
annoyed because instead of being dropped off the school roof, as advertised,
they were dropped from the top of a ladder. Ours TOTALLY could have survived
being dropped off the roof.) The kids got their latest round of shots on Tuesday, and it was apparantly a
complete nightmare (I was still at work). It took two hours to get them calmed
down enough to get the shots. TWO HOURS. The Winemaker said he had to corral them a few
times to keep them from racing out the door, or from grabbing stuff in the
office, but otherwise he tried to just calm them and be with them rather than
coercing or physically forcing them to get the damn shots. I'm pretty sure I
would have just offered to lay on top of the kids after about half an hour of
this. According to Oak, the reason he finally let the shots happen was not
because of the roller skating outing Papa offered, but because he doesn't want to
get sick. So the Winemaker and the doctor must have done a good job explaining why they
were trying to stick needles in him. Anyway, we've noticed since then that
Oak, while still being Oak, has been mostly cheerful and easier than usual
to redirect when he starts getting riled up. We think that something about the
way the Winemaker supported him and stuck with him when he was completely falling apart
made him feel safer. The Winemaker didn't give in--that wouldn't be repsonsible, and
Oak understands that. WM didn't get mad and force him physically--which is
probably what Oak expected. He managed to balance "Yes, the grown-ups are in
charge and making decisions in your best interest" with "I am not going to scare
you or overpower you." This let Oak really know he can trust his Papa as a
parent. That's our theory anyway. We'll see how long the effects
last.
I'm
still working on not being the mean and scary one. It's amazing how hard that is for
me. Maybe "amazing" isn't the right word. Horrifying? Apalling? Mortifying?
But I am getting better, with my craziest shit happening less often and for
shorter durations. The class we're taking is good, and one of the experts whose
material we use also has a bunch of free videos online (yay for Karyn Purvis!), so the WM and I watch those
for mid-week boosters. The class is run by a therapist who has fifteen kids. I
don't know how many are adopted, but I'm guessing about 12 of them. She is
mellow (and organized, but I guess you'd have to be!) and OUR therapist, who
adores her, let us know that her oldest kids say that she too was crazy when
they were young. The message being, it's hard, but you can learn how
to do this better.
It's
really weird for me when people at work say, "So, are the kids all settled in
now? Everyone's adjusted?' I probably would have done the same before we
adopted, so I can't really get snippy with people. But geez. As an adult, I
chose to spend about five years in Latvia. I loved it. I got to set a lot of
my own terms for how that time went. But there were times when I felt so
lonely, or disconnected, or confused, and there were times when I missed my
family so bad I just cried. Yet these little kids are supposed to be "adjusted"
to a new country, new culture, new language, and new freakin' FAMILY in six
months? Really? A lot of what we're learning in this class is about how the
brain develops when a baby is well cared for, and how very differently it
develops when a baby is not, and how to re-train the brain into new pathways.
Which takes a long time. We are JUST BEGINNING to learn what WE need to do to
help this happen. It's going to take a LONG TIME for it to happen.
In the
meantime, we're trying to be more thoughtful about spending time together as a
family, about spending individual time with each kid, and about giving ourselves
breaks from the kids alone and together. We've done some social events lately,
and we're noticing what does and doesn't work there. (They did much better when
winemaking friends they've met several times came over than when some of our
old friends they'd never met came over.) Next weekend we've been invited to a
large party where kids are welcome, but I've already made it known that we are
getting a sitter or I'm staying home, because I will not be able to relax if I'm
monitoring how our kids are interacting with other kids, and nobody else will be
able to relax if I don't do that. (Hey, anyone want to babysit next Saturday
night?) When we do get sitters, we try to get two, because both kids are easier
to handle individually, and we want to avoid "sitter fatigue." (AKA, No, I will
not babysit your crazyass kids any more, so stop asking already.) The Winemaker was
excited about getting Oak into wrestling, because it's a really good physical
outlet, but we've been missing practices more and more often as we realize how
important having down time at home is.
The one thing I don't feel good about is
not seeing my dad, who is in a foster care home for the elderly. I think I should at least be calling him, but it is so hard
to make a phone call until they are in bed, which is already past his bedtime. All the other things I've put on
hold I'm okay with, but I know I have limited time with my dad, and I know my dad
has limited sources of joy in his life, and I just feel crappy about not making
more time for him. I also have some minor guilt about not doing more for my
friend whose 2 year old has brain cancer, and my friend (who babyits for us! and
stuffed our freezer with dinners all summer!) who is pregnant with her first
child. But both of those families have other sources of support. My dad just has his four girls, and one lives elsewhere, and another has never made time in her life for our parents, so it's all falling on the shoulders of one of my sisters, which adds to my guilt.
Two
happy stories:
*Last
Monday we skipped wrestling again, and I took Oak to read to a dog at the public
library. He read the three books he'd brought, then pulled two more off the
shelf. He's always reluctant to try new things, and while he loves being read
to, hasn't shown any interest in reading himself, so it was AWESOME that it went
so well. They dog lady even had this little camera and printer so he was able
to come home with a photo of himself and the soft little doggie. Then the two
of us went out for frozen yogurt. Great times.
*I've been singing lullabies to Linden
recently. She really likes it, and asks for them. It just makes me happy. The other night we went out for dinner
with a coupon, and she ate three dishes of mac and cheese, then ran out of steam
halfway though her dessert. She put her head in my lap and asked me to sing
"Hush Little Baby." I can't really explain, except that there are some joys of
parenting you don't even know you're hoping for, and since it feels like what
we're doing is even MORE complicated than most people's parenting, whenever one
of those little parenting dreams comes true, it's doubly sweet.
I recently learned the words for "To Make You Feel My Love" (by Bob Dylan, but I first heard Adele's version.)
I sang it to her tonight, and she arched up in bed and pulled me down against her. When I finished singing it (from a somewhat squashed position), she said, "Mom? You wanna know what I'm thinking?' Of course I said yes, and she said "I don't want you to die."
She seems to have three stages. When she's pissed, it's "I wanna go back to the orphanage!" When she's feeling conflicted, it's, "I miss my first mom." When she's feeling love, it's "I'm afraid you're going to die." It makes me enormously sad that that's how closely love is tied to loss in her mind. I talked to her about how I plan on living until she's as old as I am, to see her grow up and go out into the world, and to fill up her heart with love so that she feels safe in the world. I told her that when the world was hard, she could always come back to us and get more love, and that we would give her so much love that even after we die, the love will last and last inside her. She fell asleep while I was talking, which I hope means I quieted her fears. At least for tonight.
Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Leila the Singing Panda
You know how when you ask someone how they've been, and they say, "Good, but super busy," you kind of want to roll your eyes? It's just such a given, that they are busy, and we are busy, and every possible conjugation of "to be busy" is applicable, so why act like it's NEWS?
I mention this only because I was about to lead with "It's been a hell of a day," then I thought--yeah, and? How does this make today different from, say, yesterday? Or, most likely, tomorrow?
One concrete difference: the kids needed shots. The Winemaker took them, bless his peaked little head. I don't know (or care much) what your stance on vaccinations is. Around here the adults avoid the flu shot but the kids get their school shots. My grandpa had polio; my mom's heart problems were caused by rheumatic fever; we believe in vaccinations. However, as new parents, we don't have much of a clue about what they're supposed to get when.
I will spare you the comedy of errors of us trying to not get excluded from public school while not subjecting our kids to needless shots, but the long and the short of it is, they had 3:00 appointments for a D-Tap and Hep A. We'd invited winemaking friends over for dinner at 5:00. I got home at 4:55, and the driveway was empty. I was confused--were we supposed to be at our friends' at 5:00 instead of the other way around? I came inside, and the house smelled like carmelized onions. Clearly, the Winemaker had started cooking. I plugged in my dead phone, but there weren't any messages. I tried calling, and a very harrassed sounding man answered.
"We're in the middle of a shot crisis," he said. "Can you call the guests and stall?" Then he was gone.
Shot crisis? Like, screaming and crying? Like anyphylactic shock? What would make two shots per kid take two whole hours? And what the hell was I supposed to be making for dinner?
I called the guests, whom, having two small children, were running a half hour late anyway. I stood in the kitchen and decided that two cans of beans and carmelized onions probably meant tortillas. I even remembered that the guests are vegetarians. I cleaned the crap off the dining room table.
Around 5:30, the phone and doorbell rang in tandem. As the guests came in, the Winemaker let me know they were done, and yes, "shot crisis" mean having to bribe/threaten/hold down screaming, crying children. I assured him he'd be handed wine as he came in the door. We wound up having a really lovely evening--probably a bit more fun than I should be having on a work night. Their tiny kids are just right for our wild pair; they play sweetly with the toddler and coo at the baby. Our friends are mellow and think our kids are awesome. We drank a bunch of wine. As I served up dinner, Oak said, "It's all grownup food," and I decided to let it go and made our kids peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. Linden changed into a skirt so she could show everyone the three bandaids on her leg.
They stayed well into the bedtime hour. Linden started to wimper about her sore leg, where she'd jerked it away mid-shot and wound up with a scratch across her thigh. She asked me to have her newest stuffed animal, a panda we've named Leila, ask her "calm questions." Leila asked her some questions about her shots, then offered to sing lullabies. Linden agreed and requested some new songs. (Luckily Leila had just yesterday printed off the lyrics to "To Make You Feel My Love" and practiced them in the car.) Then Linden offered to sing "Hush Little Baby" to Leila while they cuddled. When she finished, Leila thanked her for singing.
"It makes me feel better," Linden sleepily commented. "My leg doesn't hurt now. I like to cuddle with you too." She wrapped herself around her stuffed panda and dropped off to sleep.
And just when I think I couldn't ef it up any more if I tried, there's a moment like that, when I think I may be doing something right for my kids after all.
I mention this only because I was about to lead with "It's been a hell of a day," then I thought--yeah, and? How does this make today different from, say, yesterday? Or, most likely, tomorrow?
One concrete difference: the kids needed shots. The Winemaker took them, bless his peaked little head. I don't know (or care much) what your stance on vaccinations is. Around here the adults avoid the flu shot but the kids get their school shots. My grandpa had polio; my mom's heart problems were caused by rheumatic fever; we believe in vaccinations. However, as new parents, we don't have much of a clue about what they're supposed to get when.
I will spare you the comedy of errors of us trying to not get excluded from public school while not subjecting our kids to needless shots, but the long and the short of it is, they had 3:00 appointments for a D-Tap and Hep A. We'd invited winemaking friends over for dinner at 5:00. I got home at 4:55, and the driveway was empty. I was confused--were we supposed to be at our friends' at 5:00 instead of the other way around? I came inside, and the house smelled like carmelized onions. Clearly, the Winemaker had started cooking. I plugged in my dead phone, but there weren't any messages. I tried calling, and a very harrassed sounding man answered.
"We're in the middle of a shot crisis," he said. "Can you call the guests and stall?" Then he was gone.
Shot crisis? Like, screaming and crying? Like anyphylactic shock? What would make two shots per kid take two whole hours? And what the hell was I supposed to be making for dinner?
I called the guests, whom, having two small children, were running a half hour late anyway. I stood in the kitchen and decided that two cans of beans and carmelized onions probably meant tortillas. I even remembered that the guests are vegetarians. I cleaned the crap off the dining room table.
Around 5:30, the phone and doorbell rang in tandem. As the guests came in, the Winemaker let me know they were done, and yes, "shot crisis" mean having to bribe/threaten/hold down screaming, crying children. I assured him he'd be handed wine as he came in the door. We wound up having a really lovely evening--probably a bit more fun than I should be having on a work night. Their tiny kids are just right for our wild pair; they play sweetly with the toddler and coo at the baby. Our friends are mellow and think our kids are awesome. We drank a bunch of wine. As I served up dinner, Oak said, "It's all grownup food," and I decided to let it go and made our kids peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. Linden changed into a skirt so she could show everyone the three bandaids on her leg.
They stayed well into the bedtime hour. Linden started to wimper about her sore leg, where she'd jerked it away mid-shot and wound up with a scratch across her thigh. She asked me to have her newest stuffed animal, a panda we've named Leila, ask her "calm questions." Leila asked her some questions about her shots, then offered to sing lullabies. Linden agreed and requested some new songs. (Luckily Leila had just yesterday printed off the lyrics to "To Make You Feel My Love" and practiced them in the car.) Then Linden offered to sing "Hush Little Baby" to Leila while they cuddled. When she finished, Leila thanked her for singing.
"It makes me feel better," Linden sleepily commented. "My leg doesn't hurt now. I like to cuddle with you too." She wrapped herself around her stuffed panda and dropped off to sleep.
And just when I think I couldn't ef it up any more if I tried, there's a moment like that, when I think I may be doing something right for my kids after all.
Sunday, February 3, 2013
Navel Gazing
I would like to be writing more, but it's hard, for conflicting reasons. First, my readership is scant (hello, you two!), so there's no extrinsic motivation to write. Next, although I'm doing better, I still feel like I'm messing up more than I really want to share, and the messing up and trying to do better is exactly what I most need to process. Then there is the shame of reading quality blogs that have a point to each post and/or are hilarious. If I'm super focused, I can stay on topic, but I am still too deep in the middle of things to have a point, or to be funny. So why blog at all? The blank books I wrote in for decades would serve the purpose of processing and recording. My handwriting, never good, has deteriorated to the point where I really should type even grocery lists, but there's no reason why I can't type a journal. At this point, I think I am still hanging onto hope of connection. If someone else can say "me too" or "try this" or even "I am listening"--it gives a taste of meaning. So many of the fine posts I've read by other parents, adoptive or not, have lessened my aloneness. If I share my story, too openly at times, and that resonates for someone else, then it's worth writing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)